Skip to main content
                    Glotters by Sissi                  
  • Welcome
  • VideoBlog
    • Language Definitions
    • Review - language topics
    • Language learning
    • Language Challenges
    • Uralic and Finn-Ugric Issues
  • Leave a reply
  • Contact me

Lars Johanson: Isomorphic process review

July 23, 2018 at 1:01 pm, No comments


Isomorphic process

Grammaticalization and copying of grammatical elements

 

What is grammaticalization? When and how does it occur? What are the special terms that we need to know to understand this field better?  

Lars Johanson’s paper on grammaticalization and copying deals with the main principles of that field. The paper gives several examples of code-copying and grammaticalization. He argues that grammaticalization cannot be shared by codes as a result of code-copying.

First, he starts with a description of isomorphism which means, ‘two or more languages share specific ways creating grammatical markers’. These ways would be language contact, inheritance or universal principles of grammatical change. The process of grammaticalization is based on the speaker’s subjective assessment of equivalence, not necessarily a typological equivalence. He explains specific terms of code-copying like Selective Copying and Global Copying, however he focuses on Selective Copying in the present paper because it is more relevant for the topic of grammaticalization. When does Selective Grammatical Copying occur? It usually occurs when the users of the Basic Code reach an advanced level of the Model Code (so, the other language from which the copying occurs).

What elements are more copiable than others? Johanson claims that more specific elements are easier to copy than elements with general meanings. What elements are the Target of Copying mostly? These are lexical elements of the Basic Code which are more likely to match the items of the Model Code which is reanalyzed. For example the word ‘two’ can become a dual marker in the other language.

What happens after copying? There is life then too. Copied elements continue developing their grammatical functions as an internal development in the Basic Code. It is also possible that the output of the process may be inherited in the related languages but without inheriting the process. However, it is possible to see the result of these inheritance which is very helpful to establish relatedness between two languages.

There is another very interesting fact about similar elements. It can happen that disconnected languages pass through the same phases. Sometimes genealogically related languages after a long period of disconnection can undergo similar or the same processes of grammaticalization. It’s a riddle!

Doesn’t it look like languages are inheriting genetic information in their very DNA?

 

Let me know what you think and leave me a comment! Don’t forget to subscribe to my channel to get updated about my new videos!


No comments

Leave a reply







Recent Posts

  • Challenge: cognates, loanwords, foreign words, calques
    23 Jul, 2018
  • Challenge: calques
    23 Jul, 2018
  • Challenge: pidgin, creole and mixed languages
    23 Jul, 2018
  • Challenge: cognates, false cognates
    23 Jul, 2018
  • Challenge: code switching, code mixing
    23 Jul, 2018
  • Challenge: extinct languages
    23 Jul, 2018
  • Challenge: Language change 2
    23 Jul, 2018

Extra info

Replace this text with some additional info. If there is no extra info, you can hide this text or hide this block by clicking the icon at the above right corner.

Created with Mozello - the world's easiest to use website builder.

Create your website or online store with Mozello

Quickly, easily, without programming.

Report abuse Learn more